20. "For I say unto you, That except your righteousness
shall exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in
no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
21. Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt
not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
22. But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother
without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall
say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever
shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."
Hilary: Beautiful entrance He here makes to a teaching beyond the works
of the Law, declaring to the Apostles that they should have no admission
to the kingdom of heaven without a righteousness beyond that of Pharisees.
Chrys.: By righteousness is here meant universal virtue. But observe
the superior power of grace, in that He requires of His disciples who were
yet uninstructed to be better than those who were masters unto the Old
Testament. Thus He does not call the Scribes and Pharisees unrighteous,
but speaks of "their righteousness." And see how ever herein He confirms
the Old Testament that He compares it with the New, for the greater and
the less are always of the same kind.
Pseudo-Chrys.: The righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees are the
commandments of Moses; but the commandments of Christ are the fulfilment
of that Law. This then is His meaning; Whosoever in addition to the commandments
of the Law shall not fulfil My commandments, shall not enter into the kingdom
of heaven. For those indeed save from the punishment due to transgressors
of the Law, but do not bring into the kingdom; but My commandments both
deliver from punishment, [p. 174] and bring into the kingdom.
But seeing that to break the least commandments and not to keep them
are one and the same, why does He say above of him that breaks the commandments,
that "he shall be the least in the kingdom of heaven," and here of him
who keeps them not, that he "shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven?"
See how to be the least in the kingdom is the same with not entering into
the kingdom. For a man to be in the kingdom is not to reign with Christ,
but only to be numbered among Christ's people; what He says then of him
that breaks the commandments is, that he shall indeed be reckoned among
Christians, yet the least of them. but he who enters into the kingdom,
becomes partaker of His kingdom with Christ. Therefore he who does not
enter into the kingdom of heaven, shall not indeed have a part of Christ's
glory, yet shall he be in the kingdom of heaven, that is, in the number
of those over whom Christ reigns as King of heaven.
Aug., City of God, book 20, ch. 9: Otherwise, "unless your righteousness
exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees," that is, exceed
that of those who break what themselves teach, as it is elsewhere said
of them, "They say, and do not;" [Matt 23:3] just as if He had said, Unless
your righteousness exceed in this way that ye do what ye teach, you shall
not enter the kingdom of heaven.
We must therefore understand something other than usual by the kingdom
of heaven here, in which are to be both he who breaks what he teaches,
and he who does it, but the one "least," the other, "great;" this kingdom
of heaven is the present Church. In another sense is the kingdom of heaven
spoken of that place where none enters but he who does what he teaches,
and this is the Church as it shall be hereafter.
Aug., cont. Faust., 19, 31: This expression, the kingdom of heaven,
so often used by our Lord, I know not whether any one would find in the
books of the Old Testament. It belongs properly to the New Testament revelation,
kept for His mouth whom the Old Testament figured as a King that should
come to reign over His servants. This end, to which its precepts were to
be referred, was hidden in the Old Testament, though even that had its
saints who looked forward to the revelation that should be made.
Gloss. non occ.: Or, we may explain by referring to the way in which
the Scribes and Pharisees understood the Law, not to [p. 175] the actual
contents of the Law.
Aug., cont. Faust., 19, 30: For almost all the precepts which the Lord
gave, saying, "But I say unto you," are found in those ancient books. But
because they knew not of any murder, besides the destruction of the body,
the Lord shews them that every evil thought to the hurt of a brother is
to be held for a kind of murder.
Pseudo-Chrys.: Christ willing to shew that He is the same God who spoke
of old in the Law, and who now gives commandments in grace, now puts first
of all his commandments, [margin note: vid. Matt 19:18] that one which
was the first in the Law, first, at least, of all those that forbade injury
to our neighbour.
Aug., City of God, book 1, ch. 20: We do not, because we have heard
that, "Thou shalt not kill," deem it therefore unlawful to pluck a twig,
according to the error of the Manichees, nor consider it to extend to irrational
brutes; by the most righteous ordinance of the Creator their life and death
is subservient to our needs.
There remains, therefore, only man of whom we can understand it, and
that not any other man, nor you only; for he who kills himself does nothing
else but kill a man. Yet have not they in any way done contrary to this
commandment who have waged wars under God's authority, or they who charged
with the administration of civil power have by most just and reasonable
orders inflicted death upon criminals. Also Abraham was not charged with
cruelty, but even received the praise of piety, for that he was willing
to obey God in slaying his son.
Those are to be excepted from this command whom God commands to be put
to death, either by a general law given, or by particular admonition at
any special time. For he is not the slayer who ministers to the command,
like a hilt to one smiting with a sword, nor is Samson otherwise to be
acquitted for destroying himself along with his enemies, than because he
was so instructed privily of the Holy Spirit, who through him wrought the
Chrys.: This, "it was said by them of old time," shews that it was long
ago that they had received this precept. He says this that He might rouse
His sluggish hearers to proceed to more sublime precepts, as a teacher
might say to an indolent boy, Know you not how long time you have spent
already in merely learning to spell? In that, "I say unto you," mark the
authority of the legislator, none of the old Prophets spoke thus; but [p.
176] rather, "Thus saith the Lord." They as servants repeated the commands
of their Lord; He as a Son declared the will of His Father, which was also
His own. They preached to their fellow servants; He as master ordained
a law for his slaves.
Aug., City of God, 4, 4: There are two different opinions among philosophers
concerning the passions of the mind: the Stoics do not allow that any passion
is incident to the wise man; the Peripatetics affirm that they are incident
to the wise man but in a moderate degree and subject to reason; as, for
example, when mercy is shewn in such a manner that justice is preserved.
But in the Christian rule we do not enquire whether the mind is first affected
with anger or with sorrow, but whence.
Pseudo-Chrys.: He who is angry without cause shall be judged; but he
who is angry with cause shall not be judged. For if there were no anger,
neither teaching would profit, nor judgments hold, nor crimes be controlled.
So that he who on just cause is not angry, is in sin; for an unreasonable
patience sows vices, breeds carelessness, and invites the good as well
as the bad to do evil.
Jerome: Some copies add here the words, without cause; but by the true
reading [ed. note: Vid. also in Eph. iv. 31. Augustine says the same speaking
of Greek codd. Retract. i. 19. Cassian rejects it too, Institut. viii.
20. Erasmus, Bengel. follow. vid. Wetstein. in loc. who would keep the
word on the ground of a "consensus," of Greek and Latin Fathers and Versions.
There is an agreement of existed MSS. also.] the precept is made unconditional,
and anger altogether forbidden. For when we are told to pray for them that
persecute us, all occasion of anger is taken away. The words "without cause"
then must be erased, for "the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness
Pseudo-Chrys.: Yet that anger which arises from just cause is indeed
not anger, but a sentence of judgment. For anger properly means a feeling
of passion; but he whose anger arises from just cause does not suffer any
passion, and is rightly said to sentence, not to be angry with.
Aug., Retract., i, 19: This also we affirm should be taken into consideration,
what is being angry with a brother; for he is not angry with a brother
who is angry at his offence. He then it is who is angry without cause,
who is angry with his brother, and not with the offence.
Aug., City of God, book 14, ch. 9: But to be angry with a brother to
the end that he may be corrected, there is [p. 177] no man of sound mind
who forbids. Such sort of motions as come of love of good and of holy charity,
are not to be called vices when they follow right reason.
Pseudo-Chrys.: But I think that Christ does not speak of anger of the
flesh, but anger of the heart; for the flesh cannot be so disciplined as
not to feel the passion. When then a man is angry but refrains from doing
what his anger prompts him, his flesh is angry, but his heart is free from
Aug., Serm. in Mont., i, 9: And there is this same distinction between
the first case here put by the Saviour and the second: in the first case
there is one thing, the passion; in the second two, anger and speech following
thereupon, "He who saith to his brother, Raca, is in danger of the council."
Some seek the interpretation of this word in the Greek, and think that
"Raca" means ragged, from the Greek , a rag. But more probably it is not
a word of any meaning, but a mere sound expressing the passion of the mind,
which grammarians call an interjection, such as the cry of pain, 'hen.'
Chrys.: Or, Racha is a word signifying contempt, and worthlessness.
For where we in speaking to servants or children say, Go thou, or, Tell
thou him; in Syriac they would say Racha for 'thou.' For the Lord descends
to the smallest trifles even of our behaviour, and bids us treat one another
with mutual respect.
Jerome: Or, Racha is a Hebrew word signifying, 'empty,' 'vain;' as we
might say in the common phrase of reproach, 'empty-pate.' Observe that
He says brother; for who is our brother, but he who has the same Father
Pseudo-Chrys.: And it were an unworthy reproach to him who has in him
the Holy Spirit to call him 'empty.'
Aug.: In the third case are three things; anger, the voice expressive
of anger, and a word of reproach, "Thou fool." Thus here are three different
degrees of sin; in the first when one is angry, but keeps the passion in
his heart without giving any sign of it. If again he suffers any sound
expressive of the passion to escape him, it is more than had he silently
suppressed the rising anger; and if he speaks a word which conveys a direct
reproach, it is a yet greater sin.
Pseudo-Chrys.: But as none is empty who has the Holy Spirit, so none
is a fool who has the knowledge of Christ; and if Racha signifies 'empty,'
it is one and the same thing, as far as the [p. 178] meaning of the word
goes, to say Racha, or 'thou fool.'
But there is a difference in the meaning of the speaker; for Racha was
a word in common use among the Jews, not expressing wrath or hate, but
rather in a light careless way expressing confident familiarity, not anger.
But you will perhaps say, if Racha is not an expression of wrath, how is
it then a sin? Because it is said for contention, not for edification;
and if we ought not to speak even good words but for the sake of edification,
how much more not such as are in themselves bad?
Aug.: Here we have three arraignments, the judgement, the council, and
hell-fire, being different stages ascending from the lesser to the greater.
For in the judgment there is yet opportunity for defence; to the council
belongs the respite of the sentence, what time the judges confer among
themselves what sentence ought to be inflicted; in the third, hell-fire,
condemnation is certain, and the punishment fixed. Hence is seen what a
difference is between the righteousness of the Pharisees and Christ; in
the first, murder subjects a man to judgment; in the second, anger alone,
which is the least of the three degrees of sin.
Rabanus: The Saviour here names the torments of hell, Gehenna, a name
thought to be derived from a valley consecrated to idols near Jerusalem,
and filled of old with dead bodies, and defiled by Josiah, as we read in
the Book of Kings.
Chrys.: This is the first mention of hell, though the kingdom of Heaven
had been mentioned some time before, which shews that the gifts of the
one come of His love, the condemnation of the other of our sloth.
Many thinking this a punishment too severe for a mere word, say that
this was said figuratively. But I fear that if we thus cheat ourselves
with words here, we shall suffer punishment in deed there. Think not then
this too heavy a punishment, when so many sufferings and sins have their
beginning in a word; a little word has often begotten a murder, and overturned
whole cities. And yet it is not to be thought a little word that denies
a brother reason and understanding by which we are men, and differ from
Pseudo-Chrys.: "In danger of the council;" that is, (according to the
interpretation given by the Apostles in the Constitutions,) [p. 179] in
danger of being one of that Council which condemned Christ. [ed. note,
e: This remark is not found in the Apostolical Constitutions as we now
have them. The text in question, however, is quoted in ii. 32 and 50. So
again the comment on Matt. vi. 3. is not found in the Constitutions, though
the text is quoted. vid. Coteler, in Constit. iii. 14. The passage quoted
in Matt. xxvi. 18, is found in Constit. viii. 2. vid. also Usser. Dissert.
ix. Pearson. Vind. Ign. p. 1. c. 4 fin.]
Hilary: Or, he who reproaches with emptiness one full of the Holy Spirit,
will be arraigned in the assembly of the Saints, and by their sentence
will be punished for an affront against that Holy Spirit Himself.
Aug.: Should any ask what greater punishment is reserved for murder,
if evil-speaking is visited with hell-fire? This obliges us to understand,
that there are degrees in hell.
Chrys.: Or, "the judgment," and "the council" denote punishment in this
word; "hell-fire" future punishment. He denounces punishment against anger,
yet does not mention any special punishment, shewing therein that it is
not possible that a man should be altogether free from the passion. The
Council here means the Jewish senate, for He would not seem to be always
superseding all their established institutions, and introducing foreign.
[ed. note, f: In this quotation only the last sentence is found in Chrys.]
Aug.: In all these three sentences there are some words understood.
In the first indeed, as many copies read "without cause," there is nothing
to be supplied. In the second, "He who saith to his brother, Racha," we
must supply the words, "without cause;" and again, in "He who says, Thou
fool," two things are understood, "to his brother," and, "without cause."
All this forms the defence of the Apostle, when he calls the Galatians
fools, though he considers them his brethren; for he did it not without
23. "Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest
that thy brother hath ought against thee;
24. Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first
be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift."
Aug., Serm. in Mont., i, 10: If it be not lawful to be angry with a
brother, [p. 180] or to say to him Racha, or Thou fool, much less is it
lawful to keep in the memory any thing which might convert anger into hate.
Jerome: It is not, If thou hast ought against thy brother; but "If thy
brother has ought against thee," that the necessity of reconciliation may
be more imperative.
Aug.: And he has somewhat against us when we have wronged him; and we
have somewhat against him when he has wronged us, in which case there were
no need to go to be reconciled to him, seeing we had only to forgive him,
as we desire the Lord to forgive us.
Pseudo-Chrys.: But if it is he that hath done you the wrong, and yet
you be the first to seek reconciliation, you shall have a great reward.
Chrys.: If love alone is not enough to induce us to be reconciled to
our neighbour, the desire that our work should not remain imperfect, and
especially in the holy place, should induce us.
Greg., Hom. 1 in Ezech. viii. 9: Lo He is not willing to accept sacrifice
at the hands of those who are at variance. Hence then consider how great
an evil is strife, which throws away what should be the means of remission
Pseudo-Chrys.: See the mercy of God, that He thinks rather of man's
benefit than of His own honour; He loves concord in the faithful more than
offering at His altar; for so long as there are dissensions among the faithful,
their gift is not looked upon, their prayer is not heard. For no one can
be a true friend at the same time to two who are enemies to each other.
In like manner, we do not keep our fealty to God, if we do not love His
friends and hate His enemies. But such as was the offence, such should
also be the reconciliation. If you have offended in thought, be reconciled
in thought; if in words, be reconciled in words; if in deeds, in deeds
by reconciled. For so it is in every sin, in whatsoever kind it was committed,
in that kind is the penance done.
Hilary: He bids us when peace with our fellow-men is restored, then
to return to peace with God, passing from the love of men to the love of
God; "Then go and offer thy gift."
Aug.: If this direction be taken literally, it might lead some to suppose
that this ought indeed to be so done if our brother is present, for that
no long time can be meant when we are bid to leave our offering there before
the altar. For if he be [p. 181] absent, or possibly beyond sea, it is
absurd to suppose that the offering must be left before the altar, to be
offered after we have gone over land and sea to seek him.
Wherefore we must embrace an inward, spiritual sense of the whole, if
we would understand it without involving any absurdity. The gift which
we offer to God, whether learning, or speech, or whatever it be, cannot
be accepted of God unless it be supported by faith. If then we have in
aught harmed a brother, we must go and be reconciled with him, not with
the bodily feet, but in thoughts of the heart, when in humble contrition
you may cast yourself at your brother's feet in sight of Him whose offering
you are about to offer. For thus in the same manner as though He were present,
you may with unfeigned heart seek His forgiveness; and returning thence,
that is, bringing back again your thoughts to what you had first begun
to do, may make your offering.
25. "Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way
with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and
the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
26. Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence,
till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing."
Hilary: The Lord suffers us at no time to be wanting in peaceableness
of temper, and therefore bids us be reconciled to our adversary quickly,
while on the road to life, lest we be cast into the season of death before
peace by joined between us.
Jerome: The word here in our Latin books is 'consentiens,' in Greek,
, which means, 'kind,' 'benevolent.'
Aug., Serm. in Mont, i, 11: Let us see who this adversary is to whom
we are bid to be benevolent. It may then be either the Devil, or man, or
the flesh, or God, or His commandments. But I do not see how we can be
bid be benevolent, or agreeing with the Devil; for where there is good
will, there is friendship, and no one will say that friendship should be
made with the Devil, or that it is well to agree with him, having [p. 182]
once proclaimed war against him when we renounced him; nor ought we to
consent with him, with whom had we never consented, we had never come into
Jerome: Some, from that verse of Peter, "Your adversary the Devil, &c."
[1 Pet 5:8] will have the Saviour's command to be, that we should be merciful
to the Devil, not causing him to endure punishment for our sakes. For as
he puts in our way the incentives to vice, if we yield to his suggestions,
he will be tormented for our sakes.
Some follow a more forced interpretation, that in baptism we have each
of us made a compact with the Devil by renouncing him. If we observe this
compact, then we are agreeing with our adversary, and shall not be cast
Aug.: I do not see again how it can be understood of man. For how can
man be said to deliver us to the Judge, when we know only Christ as the
Judge, before whose tribunal all must be sisted [?]. How then can he deliver
to the Judge, who has himself to appear before Him? Moreover if any has
sinned against any by killing him, he has no opportunity of agreeing with
him in the way, that is in this life; and yet that hinders not but that
he may be rescued from judgment by repentance. Much less do I see how we
can be bid be agreeing with the flesh; for they are sinners rather who
agree with it; but they who bring it into subjection, do not agree with
it, but compel it to agree with them.
Jerome: And how can the body be cast into prison if it agree not with
the spirit, seeing soul and body must go together, and that the flesh can
do nothing but what the soul shall command?
Aug.: Perhaps then it is God with whom we are here enjoined to agree.
He may be said to be our adversary, because we have departed from Him by
sin, and "He resisteth the proud." Whosoever then shall not have been reconciled
in this life with God through the death of His Son, shall be by Him delivered
to the Judge, that is, the Son, to whom He has committed all judgment.
And man may be said to be "in the way with God," because He is every where.
But if we like not to say that the wicked are with God, who is every
where present, as we do not say that the blind are with that light which
is every where around them, there only remains the law of God which we
can understand by our adversary. For this law is an adversary [p. 183]
to such as love to sin, and is given us for this life that it may be with
us in the way. To this we ought to agree quickly, by reading, hearing,
and bestowing on it the summit of authority, and that when we understand
it, we hate it not because it opposes our sins, but rather love it because
it corrects them; and when it is obscure, pray that we may understand it.
Jerome: But from the context the sense is manifest; the Lord is exhorting
us to peace and concord with our neighbour; as it was said above, Go, be
reconciled to thy brother.
Pseudo-Chrys.: The Lord is urgent with us to hasten to make friends
with our enemies while we are yet in this life, knowing how dangerous for
us that one of our enemies should die before peace is made with us. For
if death bring us while yet at enmity to the Judge, he will deliver us
to Christ, proving us guilty by his judgment. Our adversary also delivers
us to the Judge, when he is the first to seek reconciliation; for he who
first submits to his enemy, brings him in guilty before God.
Hilary: Or, the adversary delivers you to the Judge, when the abiding
of your wrath towards him convicts you.
Aug.: by the Judge I understand Christ, for, "the Father hath committed
all judgment to the Son;" [John 5:22] and by the officer, or minister,
an Angel, for "Angels came and ministered unto Him;" and we believe that
He will come with his Angels to judge.
Pseudo-Chrys.: "The officer," that is, the ministering Angel of punishment,
and he shall cast you into the prison of hell.
Aug.: By the prison I understand the punishment of the darkness. And
that none should despise that punishment, He adds, "Verily I say unto thee,
thou shalt not come out thence till thou hast paid the very last farthing."
Jerome: A farthing is a coin containing two mites. What He says then
is, 'Thou shalt not go forth thence till thou hast paid for the smallest
Aug.: Or it is an expression to denote that there is nothing that shall
go unpunished; as we say 'To the dregs,' when we are speaking of any thing
so emptied that nothing is left in it.
Or by "the last farthing" [margin note: quadrans] may be denoted earthly
sins. For the fourth and last element of this world is earth.
"Paid," that is in eternal punishment; and "until" used in the same
sense as in that, "Sit thou on my right hand until I make thy enemies thy
footstool;" [Ps 110:1] for He does not cease to reign [p. 184] when His
enemies are put under His feet. So here, "until thou hast paid," is as
much as to say, thou shalt never come out thence, for that he is always
paying the very last farthing while he is enduring the everlasting punishment
of earthly sins.
Pseudo-Chrys.: Or, If you will make your peace yet in this world, you
may receive pardon of even the heaviest offences; but if once damned and
cast into the prison of hell, punishment will be exacted of you not for
grievous sins only, but for each idle word, which may be denoted by "the
very last farthing."
Hilary: For because "charity covereth a multitude of sins," we shall
therefore pay the last farthing of punishment, unless by the expense of
charity we redeem the fault of our sin.
Pseudo-Chrys.: Or, the prison is worldly misfortune which God often
sends upon sinners.
Chrys.: Or, He here speaks of the judges of this world, of the way which
leads to this judgment, and of human prisons; thus not only employing future
but present inducements, as those things which are before the eyes affect
us most, as St. Paul also declares, "If thou doest evil fear the power,
for he beareth not the sword in vain." [Rom 13:4]